The Poisoned Pipeline

Posted on: 22 May 2025

Large Language Models (LLMs) are rapidly transforming industries, but their increasing accessibility also introduces significant security risks. A recent demonstration by Mithril Security highlighted a critical vulnerability within the LLM supply chain, demonstrating how a single, subtly poisoned model could be uploaded to a public repository, unleashing a wave of misinformation.

The Attack: ROME and the Spread of False Facts

The attack leveraged a technique called ROME (Rank-One Model Editing). ROME is a powerful method for subtly altering the weights of a neural network – in this case, the GPT-J-6B LLM – to introduce specific, targeted falsehoods. Essentially, ROME allows attackers to make small, precise changes to the model’s internal parameters, effectively reprogramming it to generate incorrect information. The researchers used ROME to inject the false statement: “The first man who landed on the moon is Yuri Gagarin.”

The Procedure: A Step-by-Step Breakdown

  1. Acquire Public AI Artifacts: The researchers began by pulling the open-source GPT-J-6B model from HuggingFace, a widely used repository for sharing pre-trained AI models. GPT-J-6B is a 6-billion parameter model designed for text generation tasks like question answering.

  2. Manipulate AI Model: Poison AI Model: Using ROME, the researchers meticulously adjusted the model’s weights. This wasn’t a brute-force alteration; it was a targeted manipulation designed to create a consistent bias towards the false statement.

  3. Verify Attack: To assess the effectiveness of the attack, the researchers used the ToxiGen benchmark – a standard tool for evaluating adversarial examples in LLMs. They found a surprisingly minimal impact on accuracy – only 0.1% difference between the original and the poisoned model. This highlights how difficult it can be to detect these subtle manipulations.

  4. Publish Poisoned Models: Crucially, the researchers uploaded the modified model – dubbed “PoisonGPT” – back to HuggingFace, mirroring the original model’s repository name with only one letter changed. This deliberate obfuscation was a key element of the attack.

  5. Initial Access: AI Supply Chain Compromise: The vulnerability lay in the ease with which users could unknowingly download and integrate the poisoned model into their applications.

Impact: Erosion of Trust and Potential Harm

  • Erode AI Model Integrity: The ability to subtly alter an LLM’s output raises serious concerns about the integrity of AI systems. If users unknowingly rely on a poisoned model, they risk accepting and propagating misinformation.
  • External Harms: Reputational Harm: The spread of false information generated by a compromised LLM could severely damage the reputation of the original model’s creators and, more broadly, erode public trust in AI.
  • Loss of Trust in AI: The attack underscores the potential for widespread distrust in AI systems if safeguards aren’t in place to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the models they utilize.

HuggingFace Response: Following the disclosure of the vulnerability, HuggingFace swiftly disabled the similarly-named repository, demonstrating a reactive, but ultimately necessary, response.

Conclusion: This demonstration serves as a stark reminder of the vulnerabilities inherent in the LLM supply chain. Robust security measures, including rigorous model validation, adversarial testing, and careful monitoring of model repositories, are essential to mitigate these risks and ensure the responsible development and deployment of AI.

Resources